New Worlds: Polytheism

(This post is part of my Patreon-supported New Worlds series.)

Polytheism is everywhere in secondary-world fantasy. While some settings feature a monotheistic church of some kind — usually one modeled on Christianity, as the word “church” implies — there’s a strong tendency toward multiple gods. Maybe because we associate that more with the past (even though monotheism dates back a very long time and there are polytheistic religions today); maybe because for most English-speaking westerners, polytheism is the “exotic” alternative to what they know. My money’s on a bit of both.

But how does polytheism work in practice?

First of all, it’s important to distinguish this term from “pantheism,” with which it is occasionally confused. Pantheism is an entirely different concept, which holds that there is no essential difference between reality and the divine, that God is the world. I suspect the confusion arises because the set of gods in polytheism is referred to as a pantheon (from the Greek for “all gods”), rather than . . . is “polytheon” even a word? The Oxford English Dictionary doesn’t seem to think it is, so let’s go with “no.”

While you might think there’s a hard line between monotheism and polytheism, in practice it isn’t quite that simple, because of the aforemention question of what constitutes a god. An outsider could be forgiven for looking at Catholicism and seeing a pantheon with one (or three) major gods and then a lot of demigods known as “saints.” Zoroastrianism, often cited as the first monotheistic religion, isn’t necessarily so; Ahura Mazda may be the greatest of the yazatas, but he isn’t the only one, and whether the other yazatas are lesser divinities or angels (and is there a difference . . . ?) varies between interpretations.

Some of those questions belong more properly in an essay on monotheism (look for that in the future). When it comes to polytheism, the exact feel of the religion can vary wildly. As I mentioned in the last essay, Roman religion was very contractual in nature: one of its central principles was do ut des, Latin for “I give, so that you may give.” It was very much built around the idea that mortals could bargain with the gods. Whereas if you read a Hindu epic, you’ll certainly find characters making offerings to the gods — but the ones who really want something often engage in ascetic practices until they draw divine attention. According to my college professor, such austerities generate tremendous spiritual heat, and it’s this heat which motivates the gods into taking action.

Unfortunately, a lot of the polytheisms I see in fiction feel more like Dungeons & Dragons than any real religion. For all that the various settings of that game rely heavily on pantheons of gods, few if any of the writers behind these worlds seem to really understand how that works. In particular, because of the alignment system in D&D — a moral framework that (in most editions) maps things out along the axes of good-neutrality-evil and law-neutrality-chaos — there are deities who are outright evil. And these deities, for some reason, have official priesthoods whose job is not to propitiate the dangerous powers so they won’t turn their wrath against mortals; instead it’s to cheer “yay, evil!” and do everything they can to spread things like plague and destruction throughout the world. Which . . . is really not how that tends to work.

Another way this type of fictional polytheism tends to go wrong is by being far too tidy. Every god has a clearly-defined sphere, and in many cases those spheres don’t overlap at all. Every god also has a holy (or unholy) text — often with a thoroughly artificial-sounding title, like The Bones Land in a Spiral (yes, Pathfinder, I’m going to pick on you) — as well as a favored weapon (used by their clerics) and a symbol. The use of symbols, whether weapons or otherwise, isn’t fundamentally unrealistic; icons like Poseidon’s trident, Shiva’s crescent moon, or Inari’s fox are a major part of how archaeologists identify religious artifacts as being related to a certain deity. But real symbols tend to be fairly simple. In games, the symbols are often incredibly complex, even to the point of specifying the necessary colors: the elven goddess Yuelral in Pathfinder has the symbol of “three crystals of pink, blue and green overlapping in the middle to form a six-pointed star shape surrounded by a golden circle.” Have fun carving that into a stone wall!

But the biggest mistake D&D-style polytheism usually makes involves how the people in that world relate to their gods. Time and time again, you’ll get characters, settlements, or whole nations identified as being worshippers of a single specific god.

This isn’t entirely wrong. Monolatry is the term for worshipping one god while acknowledging the existence of others. But it often happens in one of two contexts: either the worshipper’s way of life means that one thing is important to them above all others, or the worshipper’s theology elevates their chosen god to a sufficiently supreme and all-encompassing position that no others are needed.

You might see the former in the case of sailors, i.e. people whose lives are dominated by a single force (the sea) that could kill them any time. They won’t deny that it’s important to give offerings to the deities of agriculture and justice and so forth; it’s just that they leave such work to other people. Professional soldiers may also devote themselves to a particular god (as seems to have been the case with Mithraism in Rome, though we know so little about Mithraic cult activities that it’s hard to be sure whether that carried specific relevance for men at war). You see the latter in the case of Atenism during the Amarna period in Egypt, and in traditions like Shaivism in Hinduism, where Shiva is venerated as the Supreme Being.

But in a polytheistic society, most people are going to venerate different gods at different times, according to circumstances. They’ll make offerings to the deity of agriculture at times of planting and harvest, and offerings to the deity of marriage when getting hitched or trying to find a spouse for their child. They’ll pray in one temple for recovery from illness, and another one for justice when they’re wronged. If there aren’t separate temples for all of these things, they’ll still direct their prayers to the appropriate name — because the power in charge of death probably won’t be much use in helping you conceive a child. (Unless your theology happens to say the same entity is in charge of both things. Weirder pairings have happened.) Worship in this context is often fluid and situational, rather than fixed, and even a dedicated priest of a specific god may not see anything wrong with making offerings to another deity.

But who makes what offerings and when depends in part on what type of god you’re talking about. And that’s what we’ll discuss next week.

The Patreon logo and the text "This post is brought to you by my imaginative backers at Patreon. To join their ranks, click here!"



About Marie Brennan

Marie Brennan is a former anthropologist and folklorist who shamelessly pillages her academic fields for inspiration. She recently misapplied her professors' hard work to the short novel Driftwood and Turning Darkness Into Light, a sequel to the Hugo Award-nominated Victorian adventure series The Memoirs of Lady Trent. She is the author of several other series, over sixty short stories, and the New Worlds series of worldbuilding guides; as half of M.A. Carrick, she has written The Mask of Mirrors, first in the Rook and Rose trilogy. For more information, visit, Twitter @swan_tower, or her Patreon.


New Worlds: Polytheism — 13 Comments

  1. Pingback: New Worlds: Polytheism - Swan Tower

  2. > because the power in charge of death probably won’t be much use in helping you conceive a child. (Unless your theology happens to say the same entity is in charge of both things.
    Given the level of danger in childbirth, I could see that happening.

    This week’s essay reminded me of a detail in a _Stargate SG-1_ fanfic i read: the soldiers and other jaffa loyal to the goa’uld Apophis believed that, when they died, Apophis *would not eat* their souls, and thus they could pass safely and easily to paradise…it was everyone else who were in danger from Apophis.

    this was another terrific essay; bravo!

    • Frustratingly, many D&D-style cosmologies don’t even think of that bit! Which in some ways makes sense; the whole point of hell as an afterlife is to punish evil people, so if you could make your afterlife . . . better . . . by being evil . . . it kind of falls apart. (Unless, as with that fanfic, you posit that everybody else is wrong about the cosmos.) But about the best you can usually hope for is to become a minion of the evil afterlife bureaucracy — which, because they’re evil, is a sucky position to be in.

      • apologies for my inclarity…its not that everyone else was wrong about the cosmos – its that the evil god’s worshippers are exempted from the risky or bad bits. (i suppose an example with the non-fanfiction Anubis or Hades would be, “worship me, and your soul doesn’t get judged – you go straight to paradise without the danger of ending up in Tartarus or in the bowls of Ammitt”)

      • I’ve actually talked about aferlives in the context of D&D, where, I hold, that the “evil” afterlives are not intended as punishments. Due to the way alignments and the Outer Planes are set up, afterlife in D&D tends to be “going to a place where the world works the way you always thought it did.” If you were Chaotic Evil, you go to place where Might makes Right and everyone will sell their grandmother for advantage. If you were Lawful Good you go to place where the rules exist to help people and pitching in with others gets things done. If winding up in a Chaotic Evil afterlife sucks, that’s not because you’re being punished… it’s just a natural consequence of being relatively weak in a chaotic evil world.

        As you say, though, I think not enough is given to the idea of propitiating the “evil” deities… offering to the Rat God to keep the rats away.

  3. The bit able evil gods and their priests got me thinking: what is the difference between an evil god and a demon? Is there a difference? It would be really interesting to have an essay on demons as part of the religion series.

      • There’s been an essay about demons! It’s in the Year Three collection now. Demons occupy a lot of the “this is just bad” position in many cosmologies, being responsible for things like disease and strife. But unlike gods, they don’t receive worship; the traditions around them are focused on repelling their influence. Efforts to deliberately invoke them are counted as evil magic, not religion, and that’s generally done by random individuals rather than by hierarchical priesthoods with temples that are for some reason allowed to sit out in public.

    • I *think* evil gods can be downgraded to demons…usually when a new religion moves in and wants to give the impression that the “demons” aren’t that impressive to them. (see classical Greece’s Pan, for example, or the ancestors of the succubi)

      …not sure if a demon (or an angel, for that matter) could get *promoted* to godhood. sorry.

  4. And if you go crazy, your family makes appropriate offerings to a god known to drive people crazy. If you stay crazy, they conclude that wasn’t the god you offered, and go on to the next god.