Weird Science: The Return of the Condor

Remember the California Condor? Twenty-five years or so ago there was, like, 12 left. That’s an exaggeration; there were 22. Remember the grim documentary, probably from National Geographic, depicting the bird’s dire situation? Ecologists were wringing their hands over whether or not they should bring the entire population in to captivity where they’d be safer. Maybe inside they could keep disease and predators away from the condor chicks. They figured as the condor numbers grew, the species could be reintroduced to the wild. The romantic Born Free idea.

I remember thinking, right, like that’s going to work. I couldn’t believe that it would be healthier for a wild animal to live in a cage. I couldn’t imagine humans would not botch it up. Introduce some horrible new disease and wipe out the entire population in the course of season. Or maybe the project would run out of money and the poor birds would be dispensed to various zoos across the country. A couple of breeding pairs to Toledo, a solitary old couple to the National Zoo in D.C. I held out no hopes for this lost bird.

I am overjoyed to say I was way wrong.

The biologists have done well. The California condor population is not yet thriving but it is increasing. According to the National Park Service, there are 394 birds as of October 31 of last year and most of them–205 of them–are living out in the wild. Some of them are even being born free!

My throat gets all lumpy when I think of it. Condors produce one egg every two years. And that egg is not always fertile. I can’t believe the success the condor program has had so far when faced with such odds.

Condors are majestic birds; the adults have a wingspan of over 9 feet. They live up to 60 years and mate for life. Although the birds once numbered in the thousands, their numbers in recent times dwindled, mostly due to habitat loss and use of lead shot and DDT. Since the birds are scavengers, they are at the very top of the food chain. Whatever is found in the bodies of their prey will wind up in theirs. And as lead and DDT accumulated in the environments, so too did it accumulate in the condors’ prey and then, of course, in the condors themselves.

Fortunately DDT was eventually banned. Unfortunately lead is still a problem. According to the Hunting With Non-Lead Ammunition website, “Once lead bullet fragments are taken into the digestive system, the lead is dissolved by the very acidic conditions found in bird and mammal stomachs. This dissolved lead is absorbed into the bloodstream and then into the tissues and bones. Once present, the lead destroys the myelin sheath that insulated the nerve fiber bundles. This disruption causes a number of problems, including tremors, convulsions, lack of coordination, paralysis of the digestive system, and eventually either kills the animal outright or makes it too weak to avoid predators.”

Lead shot is not just a problem for condors alone. Other birds, such as bald eagles, as well as animals such as humans can be poisoned by it. In my mind, the incentive to switch to steel and copper is high. Believe it or not hunting organizations, such as Ducks Unlimited, are at the forefront of conservation and as such, I’m confident that this no-lead thing will get sorted out by the hunters themselves.

Of course there are always the unbelievers, those that don’t buy into the lead/condor death connection. In the interest of fairness, when I originally posted this, I included a link to an editorial for a vitriolic argument from a certain Mr. Bodinson in Guns Magazine. I don’t remember what his argument was and I can’t find the article now, so I assume they took it down. Suffice it to say there are unbelievers, but I don’t know what their point is and personally I don’t think I care. I file them in the same drawer I keep the climate skeptics, the flat Earthers, and those who think the world began 4000 years ago.

I’m sure lead shot is cheaper than steel or copper, otherwise there would be no argument at all. And I understand if someone is hunting as a means to supplement an inadequate income they need to keep costs down as much as possible, but the world is no longer as simple as it once was. Humanity’s impact on the environment is much bigger than it ever was when we were all living a little closer to the bone. If the lead in the environment is not coming from hunting operations, we need to find out where it is coming from. That should have been Mr. Bodinson’s argument, rather than just petulantly folding his arms across his chest and insisting he wasn’t buying it. What if he’s wrong? The price is too high.

The way I see it, the biologists have done a miraculous job in bringing these condors back. They’ve got a long way to go, and yes, it costs tons of money, but as they are safeguarding the environment for the condors, they are safeguarding it for all the wild animals. And us. That goes a long way. And if it costs a lot of money, that’s only because as humans we’ve done a lot of damage and now we have to pay for it.

Here’s wishing the condor all the success in the world and a happy return to the wild.

Sue Lange

This essay was first posted on December 27, 2011 at the Singularity Watch blog. As of this updated posting, the National Park Service has announced there are 405 condors now living in the world.

Download Sue Lange’s wicked satire: PremiumExchangTM for a limited time only: mobi, epub, or pdf.




Weird Science: The Return of the Condor — 5 Comments

  1. Oh, that’s good to know. I remember reading about that frighteningly small number, and mentally braced to hear that the last condor had died.

  2. I must be bringing a non-gun-user’s sensibility to this, but why not use -stone- shot? Milled gravel. Something organic, as it were. So very Stone Age! You could market it as retro.

  3. Brenda, I love you. For some reason I don’t think the gun users care about being retro. But if it’s possible to use milled gravel for shot, I’ll bet there are whole tribes of people out there using it. Will have to check it out.

    I’m like you Sherwood. I thought it was a foregone conclusion. Not quite a happy ending yet, but getting there.

  4. There is a logical reason why shotgun owners would want to use lead shot. It is softer metal and there is less wear and tear on the inside of the gun barrel. That’s a selfish reason to want to endorse lead shot vs. steel, but it is a reason. Price is also a motivator — lead shot, back when it was the standard, was cheaper than its replacement.

  5. Pingback: Things You’ll Find Interesting July 31, 2012 | Chuq Von Rospach, Photographer and Author